A wrongful death claim in California is a civil lawsuit brought by the surviving heirs of a person whose death was caused by another party's negligence, recklessness, or intentional conduct. It is distinct from a survival action, which the estate brings to recover damages the decedent suffered before death.
This page provides general legal information about wrongful death cases for educational purposes only. It is not legal advice, does not create an attorney-client relationship, and does not reflect the specific facts of your case. Laws vary by state. Consult a licensed attorney before making any legal decisions.
A wrongful death claim in California is brought under Code of Civil Procedure section 377.60 by the surviving heirs of a person whose death was caused by the wrongful act or neglect of another. The claim compensates the heirs for the losses they suffer as a result of the death — financial support, companionship, guidance — rather than the losses the decedent suffered personally.
Wrongful death law in California is entirely statutory. Code of Civil Procedure section 377.60 defines who may sue, what they can recover, and the procedural framework for bringing the claim. The wrongful death claim belongs to the heirs of the decedent — not to the estate — and compensates for the heirs' own losses from the death rather than for the suffering experienced by the decedent before dying.
The companion claim to wrongful death is the survival action under CCP section 377.30. The survival action belongs to the estate and compensates for the losses the decedent suffered from the time of the injury until death — medical expenses, pain and suffering before death, property damage. The wrongful death claim and the survival action arise from the same underlying negligent act and are typically filed together, but they are legally distinct claims with different plaintiffs (heirs versus estate) and different damages.
In California, wrongful death cases arise most commonly from motor vehicle accidents, truck crashes, motorcycle fatalities, pedestrian fatalities, workplace accidents, medical malpractice, and product liability. The death of the decedent does not have to have been instantaneous — a person who suffers a severe accident and dies weeks later from resulting injuries gives rise to both a survival action (for the period of suffering before death) and a wrongful death claim (for the heirs' ongoing losses).
The statute of limitations for a wrongful death claim in California is two years from the date of death under CCP section 335.1. This is measured from the date of death, not the date of injury — an important distinction in cases where the decedent survives for weeks or months after the accident.
The heirs of a person whose death was caused by another party's negligence have the legal right to bring a wrongful death claim under Code of Civil Procedure section 377.60. This claim compensates the heirs — not the estate — for the economic and non-economic losses they suffer as a result of the death.
Economic damages in a California wrongful death case include the present value of the financial support the decedent would have provided over their expected lifetime, the monetary value of household services the decedent would have performed, and funeral and burial expenses. For a young working-age decedent with a long career ahead, the present value of lost future earnings — calculated by a forensic economist — can be the largest single component of the claim.
Non-economic damages compensate each heir individually for the loss of love, companionship, affection, society, solace, moral support, guidance, and training the decedent would have provided. These damages are evaluated per heir and are not capped in California wrongful death cases against private parties. Government entity defendants are subject to a $250,000 non-economic damage cap under Government Code section 985.
A cause of action for the death of a person caused by the wrongful act or neglect of another may be asserted by any of the following persons or by the decedent's personal representative on their behalf: (a) The decedent's surviving spouse, domestic partner, children, and issue of deceased children, or, if there is no surviving issue of the decedent, the persons, including the surviving spouse or domestic partner, who would be entitled to the property of the decedent by intestate succession.
Fault in a California wrongful death case follows the same comparative negligence framework as any personal injury claim under Civil Code section 1714. The heirs must prove that the defendant owed the decedent a duty of care, breached that duty, and that the breach caused the death. All elements of negligence apply with the same evidence standards as a non-fatal injury claim.
California's pure comparative fault system applies to wrongful death cases. If the decedent shared responsibility for the accident — speeding at the time of the collision, failing to wear a seatbelt, or other conduct that contributed to the death — the heir's recovery is reduced proportionally by the decedent's percentage of fault. A decedent found 25% at fault in a case where the heirs' total damages are $2 million recovers $1.5 million for the heirs.
Wrongful death cases from motor vehicle accidents use the same fault evidence as non-fatal accident cases: police reports, witness statements, EDR data, traffic camera footage, accident reconstruction analysis, and Vehicle Code violation evidence. Cases involving commercial trucks add FMCSA regulatory compliance analysis and evidence of carrier negligence in driver hiring, training, and supervision.
Product liability wrongful death cases — where a defective vehicle, medical device, or consumer product caused the death — require additional expert analysis of the product design, manufacturing process, and the failure mode that caused the injury. These cases typically name multiple defendants: the product manufacturer, component suppliers, distributors, and retailers who may all bear liability for placing a defective product in the stream of commerce.
The insurance landscape in wrongful death cases depends on the underlying cause of death. Motor vehicle fatalities are governed by the at-fault driver's auto liability coverage, with the same policy limits and underinsured motorist framework as any vehicle accident claim. California's minimum auto liability limits of $30,000 per person are almost universally insufficient in wrongful death cases — the policy limits are typically exhausted quickly, and the claim then looks to UIM coverage on the decedent's own auto policy or the heirs' policies.
Commercial trucking fatalities are governed by FMCSA minimum liability insurance requirements of $750,000 for general freight carriers. These limits are higher than personal auto minimums but may still be insufficient for a case involving the death of a young wage earner with significant future earnings. Excess coverage, umbrella policies, and multiple defendant theories are all relevant in commercial truck wrongful death cases.
Premises liability wrongful deaths — where a property defect caused a fatal fall or structural failure — are covered by the property owner's commercial general liability or homeowners liability coverage. Product liability wrongful deaths may trigger recall insurance and product liability coverage at commercial limits.
Government entity wrongful death claims — arising from fatal accidents involving government vehicles or on government-maintained property — require a government tort claim within six months under Government Code section 945.4 before a lawsuit can be filed. Government Code section 985 caps non-economic damages at $250,000 in claims against government entities, which significantly affects the total recovery calculation in government entity wrongful death cases.
Death certificate and autopsy report: The official cause of death documentation is the foundation of the causation element in every wrongful death case. In accident-related fatalities, the autopsy report documents the specific injuries that caused death — critical for medical causation testimony and for countering arguments that the death resulted from pre-existing conditions rather than the accident.
All accident scene evidence: The same evidence that matters in a non-fatal accident case — police reports, photographs, dashcam footage, witness statements, EDR data — applies with even greater urgency in a wrongful death case. Evidence preservation should begin within hours of the fatal accident.
Decedent's financial and employment records: Lost future earnings are a major economic damage component in wrongful death cases involving working-age decedents. Tax returns, pay stubs, career trajectory documentation, and employer letters establish the earnings base that expert economists project forward to calculate lost financial support. The younger the decedent at the time of death, the larger the present value of lost future earnings.
Evidence of the decedent's relationship with heirs: Non-economic damages in wrongful death cases — loss of companionship, guidance, moral support, and training — require evidence of the actual relationship between the decedent and each heir. Photographs, communications, testimony from family members and friends, and records of time spent together all support the non-economic damage claims of each heir.
Decedent's medical records: Both the survival action (covering the decedent's suffering before death) and the wrongful death claim (covering the heirs' future losses) require the decedent's medical records. The survival action uses records documenting the severity of injuries and the suffering experienced before death; the wrongful death claim uses them for causation analysis.
General answers about wrongful death cases. These are educational — your specific situation requires a licensed attorney.
Code of Civil Procedure section 377.60 designates who may bring a wrongful death claim: the decedent's surviving spouse, domestic partner, children, and issue of deceased children have primary standing. If there are no surviving spouse, domestic partner, or children, persons who would be entitled to the decedent's property by intestate succession may bring the claim. Financial dependents who were not heirs under intestate succession may have standing if they can prove they were dependent on the decedent for financial support.
A wrongful death claim under CCP section 377.60 is brought by the heirs and compensates for the heirs' own losses from the death — lost financial support, companionship, guidance. A survival action under CCP section 377.30 is brought by the estate and compensates for the losses the decedent suffered personally before dying — medical expenses, pre-death pain and suffering, property damage. Both claims arise from the same negligent act and are typically filed together, but they have different plaintiffs, different damages, and different legal standards.
California wrongful death heirs can recover: financial support the decedent would have provided (based on projected lifetime earnings less the decedent's own living expenses), the monetary value of household services the decedent would have performed, funeral and burial expenses, and non-economic damages including loss of love, companionship, comfort, affection, society, solace, moral support, and guidance. Unlike survival actions, wrongful death non-economic damages are not capped in California except in government entity cases (capped at $250,000 under Government Code section 985).
The statute of limitations for a California wrongful death claim is two years from the date of death under Code of Civil Procedure section 335.1. This runs from the death date, not the accident date — a meaningful distinction when the decedent survived the initial accident for weeks or months. Claims against government entities require a government tort claim within six months of death. Missing either deadline permanently bars the claim.
Yes. Adult children are specifically listed as persons with standing to bring a wrongful death claim under CCP section 377.60 regardless of their own age. However, the measure of damages for adult children who were financially independent of the parent is more limited than for minor children or financially dependent adults. The primary non-economic damages available to adult children are loss of companionship, guidance, and moral support — elements that courts and juries weigh based on the actual quality of the parent-child relationship.
Motor vehicle accidents are the most common cause of wrongful death claims in California. The at-fault driver's liability coverage, UIM analysis, and comparative fault framework are the same as in non-fatal car accident cases.
car accident guide →Commercial truck fatalities involve FMCSA regulatory analysis, carrier negligence, and minimum $750,000 liability coverage. Multiple defendants — driver, carrier, broker — may share liability in commercial truck wrongful death cases.
truck accident guide →Pedestrians struck by vehicles represent a significant share of California wrongful death cases. Vehicle Code violations by the driver establish negligence per se in pedestrian fatality cases.
pedestrian accident guide →Motorcycle fatalities produce wrongful death claims with the same legal framework as other vehicle deaths but with specific lane-splitting, helmet, and insurance issues that distinguish motorcycle cases.
motorcycle accident guide →The statute of limitations for wrongful death cases varies by state — from 1 year to 6 years. Use the reference tool to look up your state's general deadline and key exceptions.
This site provides legal information, not legal services. To find a licensed attorney who handles wrongful death cases in your state, use one of these verified directories.